Despite long-term exploration into ribosomal RNA gene functioning during the oogenesis of various organisms, many intriguing problems remain unsolved. In this review, we describe nucleolus organizer region (NOR) activity in avian oocytes. Whereas oocytes from an adult avian ovary never reveal the formation of the nucleolus in the germinal vesicle (GV), an ovary from juvenile birds possesses both nucleolus-containing and non-nucleolus-containing oocytes. The evolutionary diversity of oocyte NOR functioning and the potential non-rRNA-related functions of the nucleolus in oocytes are also discussed.

The pseudouridine at position 43 in vertebrate U2 snRNA is one of the most conserved post -transcriptional modifications of spliceosomal snRNAs; the equivalent position is pseudouridylated in U2 snRNAs in different phyla including fungi, insects, and worms. Pseudouridine synthase Pus1p acts alone on U2 snRNA to form this pseudouridine in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and mouse. Furthermore, in S. cerevisiae, Pus1p is the only pseudouridine synthase for this position. Using an in vivo yeast cell system, we tested enzymatic activity of Pus1p from the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, the worm Caenorhabditis elegans, the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, and the frog Xenopus tropicalis. We demonstrated that Pus1 Delta from C. elegans has no enzymatic activity on U2 snRNA when expressed in yeast cells, whereas in similar experiments, position 44 in yeast U2 snRNA (equivalent to position 43 in vertebrates) is a genuine substrate for Pus1p from S. cerevisiae, S. pombe, Drosophila, Xenopus, and mouse. However, when we analyzed U2 snRNAs from Pusl knockout mice and the pus14 S. pombe strain, we could not detect any changes in their modification patterns when compared to wild -type U2 snRNAs. In S. pombe, we found a novel box H/ACA RNA encoded downstream from the RPC10 gene and experimentally verified its guide RNA activity for positioning psi 43 and psi 44 in U2 snRNA. In vertebrates, we showed that SCARNA8 (also known as U92 scaRNA) is a guide for U2 -psi 43 in addition to its previously established targets U2-psi 34/psi 44.

The branch point recognition region of spliceosomal snRNA U2 is heavily modified post-transcriptionally in most eukaryotic species. We focused on this region to learn how nearby positions may interfere with each other when targeted for modification. Using an in vivo yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell system, we tested the modification activity of several guide RNAs from human, mouse, the frog Xenopus tropicalis, the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, and the worm Caenorhabditis elegans. We experimentally verified predictions for vertebrate U2 modification guide RNAs SCARNA4 and SCARNA15, and identified a C. elegans ortholog of SCARNA15. We observed crosstalk between sites in the heavily modified regions, such that modification at one site may inhibit modification at nearby sites. This is true for the branch point recognition region of U2 snRNA, the 5' loop of U5 snRNA, and certain regions of rRNAs, when tested either in yeast or in HeLa cells. The position preceding a uridine targeted for isomerization by a box H/ACA guide RNA is the most sensitive for noncanonical base-pairing and modification (either pseudouridylation or 2'-O-methylation). Based on these findings, we propose that modification must occur stepwise starting with the most vulnerable positions and ending with the most inhibiting modifications. We discuss possible strategies that cells use to reach complete modification in heavily modified regions.

Posttranscriptional modifications of rRNA occur in the nucleolus where rRNA modification guide RNAs, or snoRNAs, concentrate. On the other hand, scaRNAs, the modification guide RNAs for spliceosomal snRNAs, concentrate in the Cajal body (CB). It is generally assumed, therefore, that snRNAs must accumulate in CBs to be modified by scaRNAs. Here we demonstrate that the evidence for the latter postulate is not consistent. In the nucleus, scaRNA localization is not limited to CBs. Furthermore, canonical scaRNAs can modify rRNAs. We suggest that the conventional view that scaRNAs function only in the CB needs revision.

Site-specific 2'-O-ribose methylation is an abundant post-transcriptional modification mediated by small non-coding nuclear RNAs known as box C/D modification guide RNAs. The minimal structural requirements for these guide RNAs to function in higher eukaryotes are still unclear. To address this question, we generated a series of mutant variants of Drosophila box C/D scaRNA:MeU2-C28 and tested their modification guide activities in the Xenopus oocyte system. Our data suggest that box C/D guide RNA function requires either a terminal or an internal consensus kink-turn structure. We identified the minimal functional box C/D guide RNA. It consists of a single-domain molecule with (i) a terminal stem with a consensus kink-turn domain, (ii) one box C and box D connected by a 14-nucleotide antisense element and (iii) a one-nucleotide spacer between the box C and the antisense element. In this single domain RNA, the sequence of the spacer is more important than its length. We suggest that the secondary structure of box C/D RNAs, essential for guide RNA function, is more complex than generally supposed. At the same time, the expression of functional extremely short single-domain box C/D RNAs is possible in higher eukaryotes.

Small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) function primarily as guide RNAs for posttranscriptional modification of rRNAs and spliceosomal snRNAs, both of which are functionally important and evolutionarily conserved molecules. It is commonly believed that snoRNAs and the modifications they mediate are highly conserved across species. However, most relevant data on snoRNA annotation and RNA modification are limited to studies on human and yeast. Here, we used RNA-sequencing data from the giant oocyte nucleus of the frog Xenopus tropicalis to annotate a nearly complete set of snoRNAs. We compared the frog data with snoRNA sets from human and other vertebrate genomes, including mammals, birds, reptiles, and fish. We identified many Xenopus-specific (or nonhuman) snoRNAs and Xenopus-specific domains in snoRNAs from conserved RNA families. We predicted that some of these nonhuman snoRNAs and domains mediate modifications at unexpected positions in rRNAs and snRNAs. These modifications were mapped as predicted when RNA modification assays were applied to RNA from nine vertebrate species: frogs X. tropicalis and X. laevis, newt Notophthalmus viridescens, axolotl Ambystoma mexicanum, whiptail lizard Aspidoscelis neomexicana, zebrafish Danio rerio, chicken, mouse, and human. This analysis revealed that only a subset of RNA modifications is evolutionarily conserved and that modification patterns may vary even between closely related species. We speculate that each functional domain in snoRNAs (half of an snoRNA) may evolve independently and shuffle between different snoRNAs.

Spliceosomal small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) are modified by small Cajal body (CB)-specific ribonucleoproteins (scaRNPs) to ensure snRNP biogenesis and pre-mRNA splicing. However, the function and subcellular site of snRNA modification are largely unknown. We show that CB localization of the protein Nopp140 is essential for concentration of scaRNPs in that nuclear condensate; and that phosphorylation by casein kinase 2 (CK2) at similar to 80 serines targets Nopp140 to CBs. Transiting through CBs, snRNAs are apparently modified by scaRNPs. Indeed, Nopp140 knockdown-mediated release of scaRNPs from CBs severely compromises 2'-O-methylation of spliceosomal snRNAs, identifying CBs as the site of scaRNP catalysis. Additionally, alternative splicing patterns change indicating that these modifications in U1, U2, U5, and U12 snRNAs safeguard splicing fidelity. Given the importance of CK2 in this pathway, compromised splicing could underlie the mode of action of small molecule CK2 inhibitors currently considered for therapy in cholangiocarcinoma, hematological malignancies, and COVID-19.

Small nucleolar (sno)RNAs guide posttranscriptional modifications essential for the biogenesis and function of their target. The majority of snoRNAs in higher eukaryotes are encoded within introns. They are first released from nascent transcripts in the form of a lariat and rapidly targeted by the debranching enzyme and nuclear exonucleases for linearization and further trimming. In this study, we report that some snoRNAs are encoded within unusually stable intronic RNAs. These intronic sequences can escape the debranching enzyme and accumulate as lariats. Stable lariats bearing a snoRNA, or slb-snoRNA, are associated with snoRNA binding proteins but do not guide posttranscriptional modification. While most slb-snoRNAs accumulate in the nucleus, some can be exported to the cytoplasm. We find that this export competes with snoRNA maturation. Slb snoRNAs provide a previously unknown layer of regulation to snoRNA and snoRNA binding proteins.

In eukaryotes, rRNAs and spliceosomal snRNAs are heavily modified post-transcriptionally. Pseudouridylation and 2'-O-methylation are the most abundant types of RNA modifications. They are mediated by modification guide RNAs, also known as small nucleolar (sno)RNAs and small Cajal body-specific (sca)RNAs. We used yeast and vertebrate cells to test guide activities predicted for a number of snoRNAs, based on their regions of complementarity with rRNAs. We showed that human SNORA24 is a genuine guide RNA for 18S-Psi 609, despite some noncanonical base-pairing with its target. At the same time, we found quite a few snoRNAs that have the ability to base-pair with rRNAs and can induce predicted modifications in artificial substrate RNAs, but do not modify the same target sequence within endogenous rRNA molecules. Furthermore, certain fragments of rRNAs can be modified by the endogenous yeast modification machinery when inserted into an artificial backbone RNA, even though the same sequences are not modified in endogenous yeast rRNAs. In Xenopus cells, a guide RNA generated from scaRNA, but not from snoRNA, could induce an additional pseudouridylation of U2 snRNA at position 60; both guide RNAs were equally active on a U2 snRNA-specific substrate in yeast cells. Thus, post-transcriptional modification of functionally important RNAs, such as rRNAs and snRNAs, is highly regulated and more complex than simply strong base-pairing between a guide RNA and substrate RNA. We discuss possible regulatory roles for these unexpected modifications.